Results 3,021-3,040 of 11,433 for speaker:Michael Kitt

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Question Time is over.

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: The Deputy can raise with the Whips the matter of having a debate on that issue.

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Is there promised legislation on the first issue the Deputy raised?

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: The Deputy's other question is about legislation, I hope.

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Thank you, Deputy.

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Is it about legislation?

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: That is a matter the Deputy should take up with the Whips.

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: We should not have a debate on promised legislation.

Order of Business (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Again, the Deputy is asking about detail, but I will call on the Taoiseach to respond.

Health (Professional Home Care) Bill 2012: First Stage (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Is the Bill opposed?

Health (Professional Home Care) Bill 2012: First Stage (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Since this is a Private Members' Bill, Second Stage must, under Standing Orders, be taken in Private Members' time.

Topical Issue Matters (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: I wish to advise the House of the following matters in respect of which notice has been given under Standing Order 27A and the name of the Member in each case: (1) Deputy Patrick Nulty - cuts to community-based family therapy services in mental health; (2) Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan - the need to ensure that Gaelscoil Bharra, Cabra, Dublin 7, will be included in the soon to be published...

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: As no amendments have been tabled we will proceed to Fifth Stage-----

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: The Deputy's amendment is out of order on two grounds.

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: Yes, Deputy. Briefly, the first reason is that in accordance with the ruling of the Chair No. 138 from the third edition of 2006, an international agreement scheduled to a Bill is open to rejection by the House but because there is at least one other party to the agreement it is not subject to amendment. The second reason is the amendment seeks to negate the object of the Bill and therefore...

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: No, it is out of order.

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: The Deputy asked me a question and I gave him the two reasons for ruling the amendment out of order.

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: The Deputy is referring to Private Members' business but this is legislation.

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: That is the position. I will now proceed-----

Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages (7 Feb 2012)

Michael Kitt: The Deputy can make this point on Fifth Stage. We will now proceed to Fifth Stage.