Results 27,001-27,020 of 27,035 for speaker:David Cullinane
- Written Answers — Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport: Airport Policy (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 184. To ask the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the meetings he has participated in regarding a request to fund a runway extension at Waterford Airport; the dates of meeting; the titles of those present; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38461/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport: Airport Policy (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 185. To ask the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the updated costs of funding the runway extension at Waterford Airport; the amount requested from his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38462/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport: Airport Policy (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 186. To ask the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if there are caveats attached to the Programme for Government commitment to fund Waterford Airport runway extension; if so, the caveats are; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38463/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport: Airport Policy (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 187. To ask the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport to outline in chronological order all information sought and received from Waterford Airport regarding funding the runway extension, broken down by the dates the information was sought, when the information was received and any outstanding requests; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38464/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Health: Health Services (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 349. To ask the Minister for Health the total public funding allocated to companies (details supplied), broken down by year, by hospital, by other healthcare setting; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38465/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Health: Health Services (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 350. To ask the Minister for Health if it has been established if any former or current members of the HSE are employees, directors or shareholders of companies (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38466/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Health: Health Services (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 351. To ask the Minister for Health the risk assessment that was carried out when providing public funds to companies (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38467/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Health: Health Services (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 352. To ask the Minister for Health the number of health care procedures or appointments carried out by securing the services of companies (details supplied) broken down by year, by hospital or other healthcare setting; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38468/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Health: Health Services (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 353. To ask the Minister for Health the number of health care procedures or appointments carried out by securing the services of companies (details supplied) broken down by year, by hospital or other healthcare setting; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38468/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Health: Health Services (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 354. To ask the Minister for Health the likely premium cost associated with securing the services of companies (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38469/25]
- Written Answers — Department of Health: Health Services (10 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: 355. To ask the Minister for Health the processes in place to mitigate any potential conflicts of interest when securing the services of companies (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38470/25]
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: I welcome the witnesses. They have been here on a number of occasions to speak about the same issues, so I am conscious that we are having the same discussion over and over again. I am struck by what both opening statements said, which is that we need delivery and we need to move on all these issues. There is commonality across the two opening statements and with what is in the Law...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: Does Ms Walker-Strong want to add to that?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: We already identified the weaknesses in the past few years and in the past few weeks when HIQA was before the committee. HIQA cannot investigate individual complaints. We do not have a single independent safeguarding authority that can deal with safeguarding. The problems have been acknowledged. The Law Reform Commission report makes an interesting point. It stresses the need for...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: Let us cut to the chase. Ms Donnelly would have a view that mandatory reporting is really important.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: Is it also fair to say there is a difference between mandatory reporting and investigating? It does not mean that everything reported is necessarily investigated-----
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: There is an obligation to report suspected abuse, neglect or harm.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: I will bring in Ms Rickard-Clarke as I only have a minute and a half left.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Legal and Policy Gaps in Adult Safeguarding: Discussion (9 Jul 2025)
David Cullinane: That is helpful. Can I take it from both responses that there is agreement on what the Law Reform Commission sets out?