Results 2,681-2,700 of 4,571 for speaker:Trevor Sargent
- Written Answers — Passport Applications: Passport Applications (29 Jun 2006)
Trevor Sargent: Question 81: To ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs the contacts he had with FIFA regarding their initial ruling that all Northern Ireland players travel on British passports; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25215/06]
- Written Answers — EU-US Summit: EU-US Summit (29 Jun 2006)
Trevor Sargent: Question 149: To ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will report on the EU/US Summit in Vienna; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25336/06]
- Written Answers — Diplomatic Relations: Diplomatic Relations (29 Jun 2006)
Trevor Sargent: Question 117: To ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he has made contact with Prime Minister, Milo Djukanovic, following Montenegro's recent vote for independence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20712/06]
- Dublin-Monaghan Bombings. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: Question 3: To ask the Taoiseach if he has received a further interim report from the MacEntee Commission into the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings; when a final report can be expected; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22906/06]
- Dublin-Monaghan Bombings. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: I am reluctant to ask questions about the reasoning behind the extension of the MacEntee commission except to state that the expectations are high for the publication by the end of July. The Taoiseach has stated that the Barron report has been seen by different Departments and is now, following Cabinet discussion, going to committee. Is this the route the Taoiseach expects the MacEntee report...
- Office of the Attorney General. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: Question 10: To ask the Taoiseach the changes in procedures which have been introduced in the Office of the Attorney General following the recommendations of the 1994 report of the review group on the Office of the Attorney General; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24574/06]
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: The Taoiseach will be relieved to hear I will not be calling for a recount in Dublin North this close to a general election but many people will want to know where the 1,294 missing votes have gone. As this is the last Leaders' Questions this session in which the Green Party will have the opportunity of posing a question, I ask the Taoiseach to reflect on what his Government is elected to do....
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: This is the important point. Does the Taoiseach accept he is standing over a kick-back for the builder for every house built of about â¬90,000? I ask the Taoiseach, over the summer, to try to square that kick-back for land speculators and developers with his conscience and his responsibilities and tell us whether he will consider at long last implementing the Kenny report on building land...
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: He is the Taoiseach.
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: Where is the legislation?
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: The answer would be to tell me when the legislation is to be published and I ask him that. If the Taoiseach wants to give me a serious answer, I want to hear it. Fianna Fáil has been in Government for 20 years, apart from a short respite, and life continues to be unbearable for many of the people the Taoiseach claims to represent. When it comes to building land, following rezoning in...
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: That is very much a topical issue.
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: A drop in the ocean.
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: They cannot afford to.
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: The Taoiseach is joking.
- Leaders' Questions. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: It is shameful.
- Order of Business. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: This Bill is another example of shifting influence away from the communities affected by the projects in mind to the unaccountable part of our State. That is unacceptable to the Green Party. While infrastructural development is needed, incinerator proposals are not acceptable while the question mark over the introduction of nuclear power in the future is also not acceptable.
- Order of Business. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: We are opposed to the proposal because sufficient time has been not set aside to ensure the legislation is properly amended, if it is to be passed at all.
- Order of Business. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: Apart from the covert and truncated nature of the debate the Government proposes to conclude at midnight, what is planned will give approximately six minutes to our party to make any comments, which are extensive and will not be made within six minutes. It is unacceptable given the import of the Bill which, from the assessment made by us and by others outside the House who have expertise...
- Order of Business. (4 Jul 2006)
Trevor Sargent: I will not discuss the content. However, the significance of what is proposed in the Bill deserves a debate in its own right without a guillotine. We are willing to come back next week to debate it so that we can make clear that this is bad legislation.