Results 2,341-2,360 of 18,593 for speaker:Michael Creed

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: The central finding is that the fault was in the design of the scheme, which was designed to take into account two constituents in west Galway.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: It was not totally wrong.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: Will the Government make time available in the Chamber so that we can discuss this issue and have the facts of the matter debated on the floor of the House? The Taoiseach is hiding; he does not want to do it. The Taoiseach does not want to have an open debate on the issue.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: In that case will he arrange to have a debate in the Chamber on the matter?

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: The Taoiseach should not be misrepresenting the Opposition.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: The Taoiseach knows there are consequences for the taxpayer.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: The Tánaiste knows as much about it because she was the Minister in charge when the scheme-----

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: It would be a slight by the Taoiseach on the Office of the Ombudsman if time was not made available in this Chamber to debate the matter.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: It is an outrageous slight on the Office of the Ombudsman for the Taoiseach not to make time available.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: The Taoiseach should read the report over Christmas.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: I was here.

Order of Business (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: It is because the Taoiseach did not say there would be a debate on the matter.

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Second Stage (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: On a point of order, does the Minister of State have a script?

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Second Stage (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: The manner in which this debate is being conducted in the House is an insult to the Minister and all sides of the debate. It makes a mockery of the requirement for due process. I would like to refer to the point of order made by Deputy P. J. Sheehan which questioned whether the Minister intended to move an amendment on Committee Stage to section 25(2) of the Forestry Act 1988. Deputy P. J....

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Second Stage (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: Did Coillte consider it to be sufficient?

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Committee and Remaining Stages (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: I move amendment No. 1: 1. In page 3, before section 2, to insert the following new section: "2.—Section 24(2) of the Forestry Act 1988 is amended: (a) by the insertion of the words "but shall not exceed €100,000,000, without receiving the express approval of Dail Eireann" after "the consent of the Minister for Finance", and (b) by the insertion of a new paragraph in subsection (2) as...

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Committee and Remaining Stages (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: Take note in Copenhagen.

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Committee and Remaining Stages (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: How much did the company look for?

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Committee and Remaining Stages (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: I seek clarification on something I do not understand. The temporary borrowings are in addition to the €400 million, are they not?

Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2009: Committee and Remaining Stages (17 Dec 2009)

Michael Creed: Is the legislation so urgent that it must be dealt with today?