Results 22,161-22,180 of 33,049 for speaker:Paschal Donohoe
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: This section amends section 531AN of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 to give effect to the USC changes I announced on budget day. These changes are a continuation of a process of progressively reducing the marginal tax rate on low and middle income earners in a manner that maintains the highly progressive nature of the Irish tax system. My aim is to make it more attractive for people to...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: It is somebody who is on a salary of between €30,000 and €70,000.
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: I am conscious that even though a person has a level of income that is seen as being high for many people, the outgoings a person will have off that level of income could also be high. I am conscious that many people who might be seen by others to have a relatively high level of income might, for example, have a very expensive mortgage and a lot of outgoings because of children and so on....
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: I agree with the statistical point the Deputy is making. I am simply making the point alongside that that for a single-earner family of two parents and three children with a mortgage, an income of €65,000 to €70,000 is of course far higher than somebody who only has an income of €25,000. Statistically that is completely correct but if a one-income family has children in...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: I have information on the progressivity of our tax code which is worth sharing. There are 2.6 million taxpayer units. The total yield from income tax and USC, universal social charge, is approximately €22 billion. The top 0.1% of income earners in receipt of 4.9% of gross income pay 11.4% of total income tax and USC. The top 25% of income earners in receipt of 60% gross income pay...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: I have a table of the figures concerned. If the Deputy gives me a moment, during the course of further questions, we will aggregate the figures and I will be able to answer his question. For the sake of clarity, I said between €30,000 and €70,000. I agree with the point made by the Deputy that somebody on €30,000 is clearly on a significantly lower level of income...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: I believe tax reduction and reform has a role to play in a resilient economy. I have outlined a specific agenda on this. As I said on budget day, and reiterated at this committee, I do not want to put in place measures that remove people from the tax net entirely, whether that be on top of the people already out of the tax net. In other words, I do not want to find myself embarked on a...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: The evidence also points to the fact we have marginal tax rates that are very high in comparison to other countries in the OECD against which we compare ourselves. Workers enter the higher rate of income tax at a low level in the Irish tax code. Over time, I want to change this. The Deputy may take a different view, but I do not believe it is fair that somebody on an average wage is...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: Yes, I do. I also believe it is an issue when people work extra hours either through overtime or additional work or take on additional responsibility and the amount of income they get for that. Once they pay these high levels of marginal taxation, their additional efforts are not merited. We are entitled to different political views on the matters. The OECD and other analyses comparing...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: If the Deputy considers the budget in its totality he will see that the tax reform and reduction we deliver in respect of personal taxation is by and large offset by revenue-raising measures elsewhere. I struggle to see how the Deputy can describe this as a tax-cutting budget overall, given that its total revenue-raising measures are in excess of €700 million. He is correct to say...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: That is wrong.
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: No, it is wrong. The Deputy needs to consider the total amount of funding this budget has raised. As he knows, most of the budget day package went into additional expenditure in many areas where the Deputy would welcome it, whether in social welfare or the maintenance and steady growth of a universal child care model to try to tackle the issues surrounding the quality and affordability of...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: The Deputy is wrong. As we get into this Bill I have no doubt we will thrash this out in detail and frequently. I never made any reference to what the former Minister for Finance, Mr. McCreevy, did with his surplus. As the Deputy knows, I pointed to a fact that is correct, which is that at a time when the economy was growing and approaching full employment - I think it is possible this...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: If the Taoiseach defined people who are on middle income as people who are in receipt of the minimum wage, I have to say that up to this point I would have seen people on minimum income as being on minimum to low income overall. That is why I would see the middle wage definition starting at around €30,000.
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: Revenue records show that 770,000 taxpayers are exempt from the USC and therefore do not have USC liability. Approximately 500,000 taxpayers pay the lower rate of USC, which represents about 19% of taxpayers. About 1.1 million taxpayers, representing about 43% of taxpayers pay the next phase of USC, currently 5%, which will fall in January. The top rate of USC is paid by more than 224,000...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: Some 40% of income earners are earning between €30,000 and €70,000.
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: We will do that and I can give the Deputy the answer during the session.
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: It sounds consistent with the figure I gave a moment ago, which indicated that 40% of people were earning between €40,000 and €70,000. It truly would be a McCreevy-esque policy to say that people earning €70,000 or less should pay no USC at all.
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: I make two points on that. I should have responded to the Deputy's earlier question. I entirely take his point and it might surprise him that I agree with him that the income interests of people on very low income are of course entirely different from those on very high incomes. This is why I have tried to prioritise resources that are available to me on the standard-rate cut-off point as...
- Select Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach: Finance Bill 2017: Committee Stage (7 Nov 2017)
Paschal Donohoe: The Deputy knows the reason for that. Those who are on low levels of income already pay lower rates of tax than they have paid in the past. Let me give some figures on that. Somebody earning €15,000 will have an effective tax rate next year of 0.8%. By comparison, somebody earning €55,000 will have an effective tax rate of 28.9%. As the Deputy knows, the income gains in...