Minister Shatter claims that "The Board completely rejects any notion that its solicitors would be in any way complicit in the making of any such false allegations, and I fully support the Board's stance in that respect".
Well, he would, wouldn't he?
He's not going to undermine an organisation his department finances when the truth will never surface due to the "In Camera" rule, that imposes secrecy on all family law matters.
Maybe one day the truth will be revealed (hopefully before the Childrens Rights referendum gives parental rights to the State!).
Cathal Garvey
Posted on 13 Jan 2012 12:05 am
Minister Shatter claims that "The Board completely rejects any notion that its solicitors would be in any way complicit in the making of any such false allegations, and I fully support the Board's stance in that respect".
Well, he would, wouldn't he?
He's not going to undermine an organisation his department finances when the truth will never surface due to the "In Camera" rule, that imposes secrecy on all family law matters.
Maybe one day the truth will be revealed (hopefully before the Childrens Rights referendum gives parental rights to the State!).