Reporting a comment

Here's the comment you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!

Galway Tent
Posted on 19 Jan 2010 4:10 pm

Yes, once upon a time DDDA served a social need.

But, today DDDA needs to be totally dismantled and not cynically merged into equally challenged Dublin Council, massagers and inappropriate influencers of the Poolbeg Incinerator public process (unapproved high court judgement). Perhaps something new can be considered after five years - without NAMA inspired political interference in genuine investment. NAMA will simply use social housing to create FF photo-ops while Green-FF continues to line galway tent pockets.

Was and is Lochlann Quinn an investor at the IGB site controlled by DDDA?

Was Lochlann Quinn head of AIB when AIB 'sold' part of Sandymount Strand to Mr Caroll's Fabrizia company (ZOE Developments)? As preparation was the site conveniently labelled a 'AIB Sports Ground' to massage public opinion about the true intent? [Euro 2 Billion to Euro Billion bankruptcy apparently].

Is Mr McNamara's sister running a developer-dependent company whose partner in on DDDAs board? [Euro 1.5 Billion bankruptcy apparently].

Is NAMA a method to take cash from taxpayers to fund the bond-holders behind these capers? Is DDDA the catalylst for NAMA? Hopefully the DDDA/NAMA capers will cost the taxpayers no more than Euro 5 Billion.

Is the DDDA chairman the wife of a failed PD Leader? Did the voter-rejected PDs heavily promote building shoe-box flats at IGB, Fabrizia and elsewhere in Poolbeg - right on top of Seveso sights and the proposed waste-to-toxins incinerator? (Jan 2010: unregulated noise in a shoebox flat led directly to a murder).

Just two developers with speculations in Poolbeg have the taxpayer in a NAMA-hole for Euro 3.5 to Euro 4.5 Billion. Others have departed the country to Switzerland or Paris/London.


Why should this comment be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the comment breaks them.