Dáil debates

Thursday, 11 April 2024

Ceisteanna ar Pholasaí nó ar Reachtaíocht - Questions on Policy or Legislation

 

12:50 pm

Photo of Michael McNamaraMichael McNamara (Clare, Independent) | Oireachtas source

I noticed in the Tánaiste's reply to Deputy Pearse Doherty earlier that he talked about the importance of oversight of State funding and ensuring value for money. The Irish Mirror has learnt that, in addition to the moneys being spent by the Department of agriculture transporting pets from Ukraine, the Department of integration was paying for their accommodation, up to €20 per pet per night, but it varied from centre to centre. It is not possible to establish actually how much money was spent because there is just one invoice covering everything from various accommodation providers, and they do not differentiate between the cost of accommodating pets and accommodating humans, which, obviously, we are required to do under international law. Ireland, unlike other countries, seems to have had no policy at the time. Other countries had. Some had a policy of "Absolutely no pets - we cannot take your pets". Others had a policy of "Yes, you can take your pets with you, but you pay for them yourself". Ireland was paying for them, but we do not know how much money was spent. Based on the number of pets in the country, which was seven times more than the Department of integration knew about, it could have been up to a million euro a month. Is the Tánaiste happy with the oversight of spending in that Department when he was Taoiseach and is he happy with the oversight of spending now?

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.