Alan Dillon (Mayo, Fine Gael) | Oireachtas source

I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to this debate on the proposed EU nature restoration law. This holds immense significance for the wellbeing of future generations by addressing the urgent need to restore biodiversity loss and recognising the crucial role of restoring thriving ecosystems and habitats that have experienced a significant decline. The nature restoration law aims to reverse the decline of biodiversity and to secure a sustainable future for the generations to come.

The proposed regulation falls under the EU's biodiversity strategy and strives to restore degraded ecosystems through the implementation of binding targets. While I acknowledge the Government's support for the principles underlying the proposed nature restoration law, it is vital that it continues to actively engage with the European Commission and Council to clarify the issues for national policy, to enhance the drafting of the measure and to ensure compatibility with our national priorities.

I wish to emphasise the opportunities and threats the nature restoration law poses to our local communities, especially in the rural areas I represent. First, it is important that the targets set in this nature restoration law are realistic and adaptable to the unique landscapes of our regions. A clear understanding of the definitions of "restoration" and "rewetting" is of crucial importance. Accounting for the national conditions and distinct characteristics of our ecosystem is essential. Flexibility also plays a crucial role in ensuring the effective implementation of measures that can be tailored to our specific local needs.

Second, to achieve these targets it is vital that leading organisations, such as Bord na Móna, Coillte and others, take the initiative in implementing the necessary actions. If the targets and definitions are appropriately established, a significant proportion of restoration and rewetting efforts can be carried out on State-owned lands. Leveraging the expertise and resources of these organisations can greatly contribute to the success of restoration initiatives in our communities.

Third, it is of utmost importance that no farmers are compelled to undertake land use change. The decision to rewet their lands must remain voluntary and be adequately incentivised. This necessitates the allocation of new funding to support farmers who choose to participate in the restoration efforts. By providing the necessary resources and incentives, we can encourage voluntary participation and ensure a fair and equitable transition for our farming community, along with the use of State lands to achieve our proposed targets.

Through engaging in economic impact assessments and stakeholder consultations, we can develop a national plan that garners support from our rural and coastal communities. It is crucial to acknowledge the concerns of the communities that have dedicated generations to farming their lands. Striking the balance between ecological restoration goals and the needs of our farmers and rural communities is paramount. Their knowledge and insights are invaluable in sharing policies that work for everyone.

See this speech in context