Dáil debates

Thursday, 6 July 2017

Criminal Justice (Victims of Crime) Bill 2016: Report and Final Stages

 

2:00 pm

Photo of Clare DalyClare Daly (Dublin Fingal, Independent) | Oireachtas source

I blame myself for not explaining the differences between the amendments more sharply at the outset. I accept the points made by the Minister about "as soon as practicable". However, our amendment keeps that and is identical to the Government amendment in that respect.

Let us be clear. This is about the victim's directive and his or her interests being paramount. We do not want to impose ridiculous demands on the Garda. Both amendments state that the victims can request the information either orally, in writing or via electronic means. We are all saying that. Both amendments state that he or she shall be provided with that information "as soon as practicable". We are allowing for a scenario in which a garda might be very busy on the night and is able to say that he or she cannot give the information at that moment, but will do so as soon as is practicable. We are allowing for the timeframe. What the amendment does not allow for is the use of time in order not to give the information in that format at all. The amendment does not go on to state, as the Government amendment does, "in so far as is practicable, in the manner specified in his or her request". He or she should always be entitled to it in the manner in which he or she requested. However, we accept that that may not always be immediate. We do accept "as soon as practicable", but do not accept it the second time around. We are keen to push the amendment in that regard. I hope that makes more sense.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.