Dáil debates

Tuesday, 7 February 2017

Ceisteanna - Questions

Constitutional Amendments

4:10 pm

Photo of Micheál MartinMicheál Martin (Cork South Central, Fianna Fail) | Oireachtas source

A constant problem in the previous Dáil was how the Government failed to consult widely about the schedule of referendums and abandoned the policy of preparing detailed reports well in advance of the formal proposal being debated. In the referendums on Oireachtas inquiries and the abolition of the Seanad, the lack of a White Paper was exposed during the campaigns. In any future referendums, will the Government give an assurance that, with the exception of unforeseen emergencies, it will bring a referendum proposal to the House only when there is enough time to debate it and it is accompanied by a detailed White Paper? Will he ensure the Referendum Commission is given ample time to explain to people what is involved in a particular referendum?

When the Citizens' Assembly finishes its work there will remain significant steps before we can take a vote. Given that the Citizens' Assembly has already indicated it will recommend a change, every specific recommendation involves some form of legislation. Will the Taoiseach give an assurance that the Government will not attempt to present a proposal and then try to limit discussion? There are already discussions under way at the Business Committee as to whether a special Oireachtas committee should be established or whether the Oireachtas Committee on Health should be tasked with reviewing the recommendations of the Citizens' Assembly. A special committee would be more prudent, given the sensitivities and complexities of what is involved. It could give its exclusive focus to whatever recommendations emanate from the Citizens' Assembly.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.