Dáil debates

Wednesday, 17 September 2014

Other Questions

Planning Issues

3:40 pm

Photo of Mick WallaceMick Wallace (Wexford, Independent) | Oireachtas source

It will be interesting to see what develops. It is important that the Government learn from the mistakes of the previous Government. Every site over 800 sq. m was supposed to be subject to the social and affordable housing requirement. However, that did not happen. Originally, developers were not allowed to move such houses off site. If the Government is interested in tackling ghettoisation and working towards greater social integration, it must ensure this requirement is not met off site. Whether a site is located in Ballsbridge or Darndale, the 10% social housing provision must apply.

Another issue is that builders were allowed to buy their way out of meeting the 10% social housing requirement. That must also be stopped. The Government must also insist on there being no difference between the materials used in the construction of private and social units. Previously, there was wholesale use of white deal in the construction of social housing units and oak in private units, many of which were located side-by-side. This was signed off on by the local authorities. The Government must insist on local authorities not signing off on units that do not meet the agreed standards.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.