Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein) | Oireachtas source

In the same vein, I tabled an amendment to ensure that any PRSI levied in the manner proposed would be reckonable for benefits. While I do not intend to criticise in any way the Ceann Comhairle, as he must work within the rules, the system for accepting or rejecting amendments is bizarre. I have suggested that Dáil reform should allow Deputies to table amendments which may involve a charge on the Exchequer or people. The current rules limit Deputies who identify a requirement to change legislation. In this case, we are seeking to ensure equality by providing that those who pay PRSI on the types of income set out in the section will become reckonable for the same benefits as others who pay PRSI. It is a pity that my amendment was ruled out of order on the basis that it would impose a charge on the people. The vast majority of legislation passed in the House creates some form of charge on the people. We should be allowed to table amendments on Committee Stage, irrespective of whether they are progressive or radical, in order that they can be debated and the Government can respond.

Is it appropriate, a Cheann Comhairle, to speak to section 4 at this stage?

See this speech in context