Brendan Smith (Cavan-Monaghan, Fianna Fail)

I thank the Minister for his clarification, but I am still concerned about a two year review provision. We all know that no matter who is in government, such review periods can often be extended. They are generally never undertaken within the timeframe set, although that is not a reflection on the Department. However, it is a reflection on the system that deadlines for reviews, whether in the public or private sector, are generally not met.

The Minister has stated - this is understandable - that there is a finite amount of money available to be divided among the number of people who were granted awards by the redress board. Having spoken to many of them, as well as their representative groups, I know that a lot of them have been in ill health during the years. There has also been natural attrition of the age cohort. I wonder, therefore, how many of thelm will be alive when the time comes. We do not know the answer, but it depends on the law of averages. I do not know if dividing the finite amount of money available by the exact number of recipients of awards will provide the correct amount. I mentioned this when we were debating the legislation over one year ago when I had been spokesperson for only a few months. From speaking to individuals and groups both here and in Britain, I am convinced that a small number did not take the opportunity to go before the redress board. In the overall scheme, it would be a shame if, having met the relevant criteria, they were to be denied the much needed support and assistance available from the trust fund.

See this speech in context