Colm Keaveney (Galway East, Labour)

We saw in a recent debate on "The Frontline" that some people in our society see little value in spending public money on the arts. In the context of current fiscal challenges it is not difficult to see how spending on the arts or overseas aid can be open to suggestions that we should cut funding, particularly when they are placed alongside cuts in education or health. However, the arts and heritage sectors in Ireland play an important role in economic growth, with arts and culture contributing 7% of total GNP and 8% of total employment. From this perspective, the State's contribution to the sector is money well spent.

I was reassured by much of what the Minister had to say in his contribution last night and most of my concerns have been put to rest. The Government's reform plan is essential for reversing the damage caused by the previous Government but it should not be seen as an opportunity to sacrifice a critical sector of Irish society for short-term expediency. As the Latin aphorism states, ars longa, vita brevis, which means life is short but art is eternal. We owe it to future generations to pass on our heritage and enrich our history and past. To this end I am glad to see the Minister is confounding his critics by demonstrating his understanding of the importance of the individuality and independence of those who are involved in the arts and heritage sector, while at the same time seeking value for money in the context of shared resources such as human resources, payroll and insurance. This is an approach I have often spoken about in a past life.

My concerns about the sector are not addressed by this motion or the proposed amendment. Individuality and independence are essential for the arts because they create the right environment for creativity and vitality. Our arts and heritage sectors are kept alive and connected to the regions through small local arts and drama groups. The recent approach of the Arts Council betrays a worrying lack of accountability and is damaging the industry by creating the impression of a closed circle. I ask the Minister to investigate the issues raised by my colleagues as a matter of urgency. The arts community needs to focus on issues which are perhaps closer to home and therefore more difficult for us to address in the context of this debate.

Our efforts should be on corroboration involving all stakeholders and I am delighted the Minister has announced that his door is open to suggestions for the effective delivery and nurturing of arts, culture and heritage in this country.

See this speech in context