Dáil debates

Tuesday, 5 July 2011

4:00 pm

Photo of Enda KennyEnda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)

Let me be clear about this. As the Deputy is aware, when the motion went through the House some years ago setting up the Smithwick tribunal of inquiry part of the remit was that within ten days of public hearings being held an internal report would be produced. The Minister for Justice and Equality required that an interim report would be produced, which has been produced. In accordance with the deadline being set for November it is perfectly clear that there is no intention to interfere with the work of the Smithwick tribunal. The Justice has pointed out the number of witnesses who must be heard and the position in respect of papers held by the British authorities.

It is in the interests of the taxpayer that there be a connection related to progress being made by any tribunal of inquiry. This should be obvious. The Justice pointed out in his letter the range of hearings that must be held and the witnesses from which evidence must be taken. If the tribunal comes back to the House, which sets up tribunals, the Dáil will reflect on what the tribunal states about its ability to conclude its hearings.

Deputy Martin will agree that we have had tribunals stretching out over a long period that have cost a vast amount of money.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.