Dáil debates

Thursday, 13 January 2011

12:00 pm

Photo of Maureen O'SullivanMaureen O'Sullivan (Dublin Central, Independent)

We have basic human rights, such as a right to life, to a roof over our heads, to live in peace and to exercise freedom of expression, but a fundamental basic human right is the right to clean drinking water. In the recent past, water has posed a problem. Being an island community surrounded by water with endless miles of rivers, lakes and streams, it is ironic that areas have been without water or have had water rationed and restricted. We are also aware of the opposite occurring, that is, flooding which has caused considerable damage to houses and areas, the result of which has seen some people unable to acquire insurance.

Yesterday, the current update on Dublin City Council's website showed restrictions are still in place. Parts of Dublin and elsewhere in the country are experiencing what it is like for people in Third World countries who must queue for water. Dublin has tankers at a variety of locations and people have been told to bring their own containers. There is no doubt that the water difficulties have caused considerable social and economic hardship, be there too much water, too little or none.

Individual responsibility is another aspect. I acknowledge how Dublin City Council has been proactive in assisting people in taking responsibility by making suggestions on how to carry out leak tests, water audits and toilet and cistern checks. The council made particular suggestions about the use of rainwater and gardening. Flood protection measures have also been undertaken. However, our individual responsibility not to waste water will not be enough without significant investment in infrastructure. With €1 billion being spent every year on water treatment and supply, one would have thought there would be an efficient service, so how is the funding being managed? Is it part of the culture of excessive salaries, bonuses and expenses? There is also the serious subject of planning being granted for development on flood plains, which was most unsuitable.

We are good at overspending on large construction projects, such as the Port Tunnel, the M50 widening and the Luas, which all overran by three times their original costs. If metro north goes ahead we will be able to get to the airport by metro but it will cost at least €6 billion while there will still be people without enough water and others who face the risk of flooding.

I support the motion that covers the need for significant capital investment in water to ensure there is no wastage and an adequate supply but I also acknowledge the Government amendment that highlights ongoing major investment in water services and the commitment to invest in water conservation, which must be a priority.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.