Dáil debates

Wednesday, 17 February 2010

12:00 pm

Photo of Joan BurtonJoan Burton (Dublin West, Labour)

What is the position in regard to section 110 of the Finance Act 2007, which was introduced by the Taoiseach as Minister for Finance? That section provided for the closure of a loophole whereby property developers were avoiding the payment of stamp duty. This provision was included in the legislation after a long campaign by the Labour Party but was never implemented.

The Minister for Finance has given a statement to the examiner from Brussels indicating that we may now see legislation to close off this loophole because, otherwise, the whole NAMA process, bad as it is, will sink further. As a result of this loophole that the Taoiseach engineered and then refused to close, we have a situation where most of the properties being transferred to NAMA have no title in terms of the associated loans. There is no capacity for NAMA to work, even in its appalling way, without this loophole being closed. It is four years since the Taoiseach and I engaged in this debate on numerous occasions in this Chamber and in the dungeons of the committees as we discussed the details of the Finance Bill 2007. As a result of his failure to close this loophole, it will now cost the Irish taxpayer not just the €250 million that the Taoiseach's own consultants, Goodbody Consultants, predicted at the time, but probably now a further €20 billion in bad loans. Not only are those loans bad but the underlying securities have no title.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.