Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin (Cavan-Monaghan, Sinn Fein)

Could the Taoiseach clarify what were the influences that made the Government change its mind on the reduced fees in this tribunal's case? It was a definite statement that was made before the House in 2004. It had universal welcome and acceptance and it has never been applied. The Secretary General's remarks in July to the Committee of Public Accounts indicated that it was out of fear that some of these people would not stay in situ to continue their service. That is not a good enough reason. Were the waters tested? Did counsel indicate that they would walk away if lower fees were applied?

This is important and we, as Members of the House that established the tribunal, have the right to know. What influences were brought to bear? What pressures were brought to bear that forced Government not to proceed with a clear intent as outlined by the former Taoiseach here five years ago? Would it not be the case that there are many other eminent, able and equally interested senior counsel who would be quite prepared to fill the vacancies and take up the position and bring the process to a conclusion? We need some explanation of all of that.

Will the Taoiseach, for clarity's sake, outline whether the report he has indicated will be presented in the early new year is the finality of the process? Are we looking at closure? Is that yet in prospect? Can the sole member bring the process to a conclusion and will we see finality, with a final report, and will the Taoiseach again confirm that there is no further prospect of any other public hearings?

See this speech in context