Róisín Shortall (Dublin North West, Labour)

Earlier, in reply to a similar question, the Minister stated that improper access to confidential information occurred in only three cases. Given that just three cases came to the attention of the media, I find it impossible to believe these are the only cases in which improper access was gained to confidential information. On what basis did the Minister make a categorical statement on the number of cases? In the aftermath of three cases highlighted in the media, what look-back procedure was employed to assess access to confidential information and how did it enable the Minister to make such a categorical statement?

What role did the Data Protection Commissioner have in respect of the three cases that have come to light? What sanctions or recommendations did he make in respect of the operation of the Department?

See this speech in context