Dáil debates
Tuesday, 6 March 2007
Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2007: Committee and Remaining Stages
10:00 pm
Jim O'Keeffe (Cork South West, Fine Gael)
First, one would ask what is meant by grooming. It was put to me that grooming did not arise from a chance encounter, and I accepted that ultimately. From that point of view, in order to prove grooming it had to be proved that a person lulled a child into a sense of false security and trust and that, essentially, it would not be grooming if that arose from a chance encounter on one occasion. It would have to be shown that there were two encounters or communications to achieve, as mentioned by the Minister, a pattern qualifying as grooming.
The view might be taken that there should be a separate offence.
No comments