Jim O'Keeffe (Cork South West, Fine Gael)

An optician might have a role in ensuring straight shooting, but the role a dentist might play is beyond me. Section 32(3) provides that the issuing person, for example, a superintendent, can require the applicant to supply information requested in the application form and such further information as he or she may require, including written consent for any inquiries as to the applicant's medical history that may be made from a health professional by or on behalf of the issuing person.

Two issues arise. First, what does it mean? Does it refer to the applicant's medical doctor or psychiatrist? I assume by "a health professional by or on behalf of the issuing person" the Minister has in mind the applicant's doctor or psychiatrist. Can he clarify that the outcome will be exactly as it is framed?

The Minister was concerned about the question of an assessment. If section 32(3) requires the applicant's doctor or psychiatrist to produce a report, although it is not clear, the superintendent must assess the report anyway. Will the superintendent put the question directly to the doctor or psychiatrist whether he or she believes the person to be of sound mind, memory and understanding and of sufficient capacity to be issued with a firearm? I am not clear as to the scheme the Minister has in mind to cover the situation. I am not entirely sure the way it is phrased will achieve the outcome at which I think the Minister is aiming, if he will forgive the pun.

See this speech in context