Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)

I ask the Minister of State to clarify a number of issues raised by speakers. On the adoption of the European constitution, does he agree it would be beneficial if Ireland, which has been particularly supportive of the European project and the integration, enlargement and advancement of Europe, were to take a lead in determining how the European Union should proceed towards the adoption of the constitution, including whether the text should be revised, having particular regard to the fact that two countries have already rejected the proposed constitution? To re-establish confidence in the European project, would it not be a good idea to assuage the fears of those who rejected the document, regardless of their reasons for doing so?

On the question of enlargement of the European Union to the Balkan states, to what extent does the EU take seriously the need to address the various issues of conflict which have affected the Balkans region for a long time and determine the best possible route to proceed towards alleviating fears, abating prejudices and addressing problems?

On telecommunications and crime, an issue raised by other speakers, does the European Union believe co-operation between various police forces in Europe to tackle the problem of drugs and human trafficking is sufficient? Will the Minister of State comment on the fact that Ireland is the only EU member state in which the trafficking of human beings is not a crime? I am aware that legislation is proposed in this regard. Will the Minister of State indicate how we will proceed on this matter and if legislation will be expedited?

The issue of telecommunications was discussed at the Council in the context of roaming charges with Ministers reaffirming a proposal to abolish them. The Commission in particular has discussed the fundamental question of how to deal with the use of the Internet, text messages and other electronic means of communications for abusive, predatory, harassment and trafficking purposes and the need to address technical matters in parallel with policing issues. To what extent will it be possible to address technical issues, as distinct from policing issues, to deter those who have access to various means of electronic communications, such as the Internet, from intimidating others and carrying out illegal activities?

See this speech in context