Dáil debates

Wednesday, 14 June 2006

Offences against the State (Amendment) Act 1998: Motion.

 

12:00 pm

Photo of Finian McGrathFinian McGrath (Dublin North Central, Independent)

I welcome the debate on the renewal of the Offences against the State (Amendment) Act 1998. This is an opportunity to reflect on this issue and it is important that we debate this legislation coolly and calmly. Of course we all agree that the Omagh bombing and the Dublin and Monaghan bombings targeted innocent people and were utterly wrong. Every Member of the House agrees with that.

There is no contradiction, however, between talking about protecting civil liberties and human rights and opposing sectarian violence and expressing opposition to the Offences against the State Acts. People who raise awkward questions about this legislation should not have their motives questioned. Sadly, however, elements in society regularly do so, both in the House and outside it.

The vast majority of people on this island oppose violence and support peaceful and democratic means. A small number still believes the way forward is through violence, but they are very much the minority. Since the peace process began, there have been major changes and we have made great progress. If we do not take that on board in this debate, we are simply being close-minded.

When discussing this legislation, the peace process and the wider question of republicanism, it is my belief that true republicans should have nothing to do with criminal elements in society. That is not up for debate. We should also reflect on the meaning of republicanism in the Ireland of 2006 and come up with sensible ways of broadening that vision for the creation of an inclusive, progressive republic. In fairness to the republican movement, it has shown leadership and we should support it in this issue, particularly following its dumping of arms last year. There is an onus on us as Members of the Oireachtas to show leadership in the peace process and to be prepared to support those who are taking the major risks.

It is now up to the DUP to wake up and get involved in the talks process. It is no longer acceptable for it to drag its heels. I strongly disagree politically with the Ulster Unionist Party but I commend its leader for his efforts in recent weeks. I do not criticise Reg Empey for trying to bring in the PUP, for facing up to the reality of loyalist violence and for trying to end it once and for all. I challenge those in the Ulster Unionist Party who are jumping ship because of Reg Empey's actions to think again. He is thinking of the bigger picture and broader society. It is not simply a numbers game to gain seats in the Executive. In his recent response, he has taken a brave and difficult decision. Whether one is an Independent Deputy or a member of the Government, the Opposition, the DUP, the PUP, or any other political organisation in this country, there is an onus upon one to get out there and deal with sectarianism and violence on the island. The attack on Nuala O'Loan's son in recent days was an absolute disgrace. That woman and her family have made a major contribution to debate regarding policing on the island, and that boosted the peace process. I express my absolute abhorrence of the attack on her son and challenge those involved.

While the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform is in the Chamber, I would like to say how important it is that Ministers acknowledge their duty to act responsibly and respect human rights and civil liberties. At this crossroads in political life and the peace process generally, why are we still considering repressive legislation? I ask that fundamental question because we do not need it. The time is right for change, and I strongly oppose this legislation and urge all Deputies present to consider my views.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.