Eamon Gilmore (Dún Laoghaire, Labour)

This issue concerns a couple who do not wish to be publicly identified so I will refer to them as Mary and Tom. Mary was a lone parent with three children, who are now aged seven, two and nine months. She had been renting a home privately in my constituency for €1,200, for which she was in receipt of a rent allowance of €999 per month. On 7 April, she married Tom. Because Tom is in full-time employment, the couple immediately lost their rent allowance. Tom's income, however, is quite low, €505 per week, which is clearly not sufficient to pay €300 rent a week while maintaining a family of five on the balance.

The couple notified the community welfare officer of their new circumstances after their wedding and were informed that they no longer qualify for rent allowance because one of them was in full-time employment. They subsequently notified their landlord that the rent allowance would be discontinued and the landlord has issued them with notice to quit, effective from next Thursday.

They are on the local authority housing list and inquired as to their prospects of a local authority house. They are placed 199 on a list which has some 4,000 applicants on it. The council stated that it could not offer them housing at this stage and that they would be waiting for some time. It advised them to make contact with the homeless persons unit. The homeless persons unit informed them that it could possibly provide them with emergency accommodation from Thursday but the family would have to be separated as it could not access accommodation to house them as a family.

Recently, on behalf of the Labour Party, I proposed a motion calling for the replacement of the rent allowance system with a new form of housing support which would be related to income and would not discriminate between those in work and those in receipt of social welfare. I pointed out during the debate that the existing rent allowance system creates a massive poverty trap, acts as a disincentive to work and discriminates against working families. The Government voted down that motion. Now I have this case in my constituency and I would like the Minister to address a number of questions.

How is this family to be housed from next Thursday? They will lose their private rented accommodation, will not have housing from the local authority, will not have rent allowance to pay rent and the best the homeless persons unit can do is to send the husband and son in one direction and the wife and daughters in the another direction — back to the workhouse. Will the family get some form of assistance towards paying their rent to resolve this problem? The community welfare officer cannot do anything about it. I have spoken to the superintendent community welfare officer and his hands are tied. The regulations explicitly state that if someone is in full-time employment, he cannot get the rent allowance.

There is a question mark over the constitutionality of the situation. The Constitution protects marriage but here a person marries and loses an entitlement she previously had and will now lose her home. This case highlights the need to reform the rent allowance scheme and provide for the housing needs of low-income working families. This case requires urgent action to deal with the housing needs of this family which will become critical next Thursday.

See this speech in context