Tony Killeen (Clare, Fianna Fail)

Amendments Nos. 3, 4 and 5 would have the effect of changing the definition of "consultation" and "information" as they are in the Bill and would provide only for consultation and information through representatives.

In a great many enterprises there is already a system of direct information and consultation in place and this Bill provides for that to continue. One of my concerns was that where good practice already exists, we would accommodate it and try to ensure that it continues. We also have, quite clearly, substantial numbers of employees who appreciate having the opportunity of receiving information from and consulting directly with employers and where that is provided for already, I want to ensure it continues.

Amendment No. 4 seeks to make other changes to the definition of information. However, the wording in the Bill is stronger than would be the case with Deputy Morgan's amendment. The Bill provides for examination, which appears to be precluded by Deputy Morgan's amendment. That would weaken the impact of the Bill.

Amendment No. 32 seeks to delete section 11 in its entirety, which would disimprove the situation of a great many employees who currently have the opportunity to seek information and consultation directly with their employer, as well as those who might wish to do so in the future. The wording in the Bill is as close to the directive as possible, in the interest of accurate transposition. I have consulted widely on this issue, listened to the points made by both Deputies and examined the culture already in place in the Irish workplace. I wish to encourage those who have been disposed to having an open system of information and consultation, and in that context, the Bill addresses the requirements of the directive, the need to have a far more open culture and gives some credit to those who already have systems in place that go a long way towards achieving our aim.

See this speech in context