Fiona O'Malley (Dún Laoghaire, Progressive Democrats)

I am astonished at Fine Gael tabling this motion and at its wording. Its track record leaves a great deal to be desired, and the Restrictive Practices (Groceries) Order 1987 is a case in point. Deputy Hogan said last night in that regard that the Minister had spun the story and that he was already in retreat on the issue. That analysis would send a shiver down the spine of any consumer. The Government has dealt with the issue in the proper order and the Restrictive Practices (Groceries) Order 1987 fails to prevent such pricing. It was unable to distinguish between legitimate low pricing and genuine acts of predation.

How did Fine Gael handle the issue, however? In a classic political fudge, it was unsure and afraid of lobby groups. Fine Gael claims to be the consumer's champion, and here was a clear opportunity for it to demonstrate its credentials, something that would make a difference to the consumer. However, it shied away and was found wanting — some courageous champions. In contrast, my party, the Progressive Democrats, clearly demonstrated that it was the one to take on vested interest, calling clearly and early for abolition of the Restrictive Practices (Groceries) Order 1987. Thankfully, in the interests of consumers, that has come to pass.

Last night Deputy Hogan said that the Fine Gael motion——

See this speech in context