Dáil debates

Tuesday, 28 June 2005

Veterinary Practice Bill 2004 [Seanad]: Report Stage.

 

9:00 pm

Photo of Denis NaughtenDenis Naughten (Longford-Roscommon, Fine Gael)

I thank the Minister of State for his response. While I accept his point that the provision contains checks and balances and the Veterinary Council of Ireland ultimately calls the shots in terms of activating the provision, I am at a loss to understand why the amendment is not deemed appropriate. During every Stage in both Houses, Members were told ad nauseam that the provision would apply in the event of an outbreak of a disease such as foot and mouth disease, which poses a significant threat to animal or human health. Any such outbreak may not necessarily involve a class A disease, the definition of which may change at some future date thus requiring amendment. This amendment is well balanced and makes provision for what the Minister wants. I cannot understand why she is not prepared to consider it when it copperfastens everything she said on all Stages.

The Minister made the point about a veterinary teacher. There could be a need for microbiologists if there is another major outbreak of foot and mouth disease. The fair and balanced proposal in the amendment addresses the provision the Minister requires while providing the protection for concerns that have been articulated.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.