Dáil debates

Tuesday, 25 May 2004

2:30 pm

Photo of Enda KennyEnda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)

I have no intention of breaking your ruling, Sir. In respect of the letter received by the Government at 5.05 p.m., did it refer specifically to the process to be followed because we are concerned about due and fair process for everybody, or did it contain any reference to newspaper reports today that the person concerned may have a psychiatric condition? On 26 April, when I asked the Taoiseach about the appointment of Judge Curtin in the first instance, he indicated that a detailed check would have to be carried out as to whether members of the Cabinet were in possession of any information that might lead the Cabinet to consider an appointment such as this inappropriate. I understand that persons wishing to be appointed as judges apply to the judicial advisory board. Thereafter they are interviewed, recommendations are made to Government and some discussion takes place between the Attorney General, the Taoiseach and the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and a memorandum is prepared for Government. The law states clearly that for every vacancy occurring up to seven names can be forwarded. Did the Taoiseach carry out a detailed check in respect of my question of 26 April? Is he aware or did he have any discussions with the Attorney General about any information that may have been given to him in respect of conduct unbecoming or inappropriate behaviour in respect of this or other appointments considered at that time?

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.