Charles Ward (Donegal, 100% Redress Party)

I thank the witnesses for attending. I agree with many of the witnesses that this Bill is not ambitious enough. It is disappointing to see the Government take a major step back when it comes to equality reforms. We cannot afford to take a step back on equality reforms in the current climate. We need to push them forward to ensure we have a more equal society for everyone in the country. Although the Bill had intended to introduce equality grounds based on socioeconomic status, this is not in the general scheme and is now under active consideration. It is extremely important we introduce this ground and recognise that those with a disadvantaged socioeconomic status often face discrimination that can result in exclusion from services and employment. I agree with many of the witnesses that it is disappointing that there have been no amendments to existing grounds such as family status. I refer back to the example given of a lone parent showing up a hospital and being discriminated against because she has no one to look after her children. It is a ridiculous situation in this day and age.

My first three questions are for IHREC and the NDA. In its submission the authority recommends that the Bill should not be used to implement the EU standard directive. What does this directive do and why does the authority recommend that it be treated separately?