Malcolm Noonan (Carlow-Kilkenny, Green Party) | Oireachtas source

Specifically, Deputy O'Callaghan is correct about recommendation B.2; it is a temporary exemption. I was not here the last time for the opening conversation on this, so forgive me if I am repeating or not picking up on points that were raised then. Section 44, on the "Obligation to prepare housing development strategy", includes objectives regarding the provision of accommodation for members of the Traveller community and the use of particular areas for that purpose. That has already been discussed in terms of the Traveller accommodation programme in quite an amount of detail in the previous grouping but I can certainly furnish this to the members in terms of the additional implementation of those ten recommendations on the planning side.

I do not have the specific numbers to hand. I know from experience in my local authority that the needs of Traveller families are changing quite significantly. This is critical in terms of delivery reflecting need in category A, which is aimed at addressing deficiencies in data gathering. Many families are not necessarily opting for Traveller-specific accommodation. It is important that we reflect these needs as younger families look to find housing in their own local areas.

As I have said, this matter has been well discussed and well aired. It is well reflected in the Bill in terms of provision. It is then down to development plans specifically to deliver Traveller accommodation and to the progressiveness of the local Traveller accommodation committees in terms of their delivery at local authority level in meeting the requirements. The legislation is here for it, as in the funding, and it is critical that local authorities and local authority members are progressive in the delivery of housing in their local communities for Traveller families.