Kieran O'Donnell (Limerick City, Fine Gael) | Oireachtas source

On the first point, the main reason the word "range" is being removed is because it causes confusion. This is due to the fact that the word can also refer to data. The view was taken that the section in the existing Act contains the word "ranges" in the context of a mixture of uses. If we look at the original reading of the Act, section 10(2)(a) refers to areas in the development plan already zoned for residential use or for a mixture of uses. It was brought in as a new term and then when it was looked at, in consultation with the Office of the Attorney General, it was decided it just caused confusion. That is why we are seeking to take it out. The term "mixture" will cover suffice.

On the point raised about the practical impact, it was felt that one year was too tight if it involved two local authorities. The natural fit was that yes it gives a period of time alright but the new plans must be reviewed. Let us say they are ten years plans and they must be reviewed within five years. There is nothing to stop the local authorities going ahead and doing it much earlier but it would give a degree of flexibility if the natural cut-off point was five years thereafter.

I believe we are okay on amendment No. 125, on removal of "range".