Mr. Conor O'Donnell:

Everybody asks why IS 465 was written. Many standards could be used, including a European standard. Why was this one written? It was obviously written to cover something up. It needs to be taken away completely. Science is no longer a part of the new enhanced scheme. Why is IS 465 the building block of that scheme when it is irrelevant? The science is just being ignored. We all need to ask why was there in the first place.