Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees

Thursday, 19 October 2023

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Housing, Planning and Local Government

Consideration of the Citizens' Assembly Report on a Directly Elected Mayor of Dublin: Discussion

Ms AnnMarie Farrelly:

As chief executive of Fingal County Council, I welcome this opportunity to address the committee as it considers the citizens' assembly report on a directly-elected mayor of Dublin. Along with the chief executives of the other three Dublin local authorities, I addressed the citizens' assembly in Malahide on Sunday, 1 May 2022. We all spoke of the need to retain the existing local authorities, and I am pleased that one of the 18 recommendations in the report is the retention of existing local authority structures.

Many of the recommendations of the citizens' assembly are wide-ranging, and there is a lot of detail that will have to be worked out before they can be implemented. It is acknowledged that Ireland has a very centralised form of government, with local authorities performing fewer functions than municipalities across Europe. Dr. Mary Murphy of Maynooth University, in the research paper "Democracy Works If You Let It", found that only 8% of Irish public spending occurs at local government level, compared with an EU average of over 23%, and that a quarter of the Irish spend is not fully under local authority control.

The recommendations in the report propose devolving a wide range of powers to a directly-elected mayor and creating new local government structures in Dublin. Some of these powers, such as responsibility for primary and community healthcare, transport, education and policing, currently lie across various Departments and Government agencies, while water is in the process of being handed over to Uisce Éireann by the local authorities after many years of negotiations. There will need to be a willingness within central government to hand over responsibility and funding to the new local government structures, as well as an appreciation of the scale of the structures and the resources that will be required to deliver these additional services through the local authorities. The present situation, whereby the four local authorities deal directly with the various Departments and Government agencies for a wide range of services, already involves a lot of bureaucracy. There is a realistic fear that placing another layer between the local authority and central government will add further complexity, when the objective is to become more efficient and deliver better outcomes.

The question of how the new structure will be funded will also need to be addressed. At present the four Dublin local authorities have, between them, revenue budgets totalling €2.12 billion and capital programmes worth €5.9 billion. That money is accounted for and is used to deliver over 1,000 different existing services to the people of Dublin city and county, as well as building the infrastructure to allow the Dublin region to grow sustainably.

In Fingal, we have just unveiled a three-year capital programme worth €1.35 billion, with 67 of the 312 projects already on site. Those projects will deliver much-needed infrastructure to a county with a growing population, so it is important we are able to maintain that level of delivery into the future.

Clarification is also needed around the structure and the membership of the Dublin city and county assembly and its relationship with the mayor, his or her cabinet and the local authorities. Will the assembly's membership be made up of existing councillors from the four local authorities or will it consist of a totally different cohort of public representatives? There would be better linkage between the assembly and the councils if the membership of the assembly were to consist of councillors elected by their respective councils, similar to the membership of the regional assemblies. The number of councillors from each council should be based on the population of their respective local authority areas in order that there is equitable representation. There were 12 councillors on the citizens' assembly and, because the allocation of seats was proportionate to the relative strength of the parties and groups across the four Dublin local authorities, Fingal ended up with only one councillor among the 12.

The membership of the mayor's cabinet also requires in-depth examination as it is recommended that the majority of members be councillors. That could mean that a councillor could be a member of his or her local council, a member of the plenary session, a member of the city and county assembly and a member of the mayor's cabinet. This will be a heavy and demanding workload, and I note the recommendation that councillors should be paid, full-time public representatives with secretarial support.

As a local authority we are the closest form of government to the people. Fingal makes up 49% of County Dublin, and our council has become the third biggest local authority in Ireland in terms of population, budgets and staffing numbers. Our councillors and staff have worked hard over the past 30 years to develop a distinctive and self-reliant council that has created a part of Dublin in which people enjoy living.

Whenever a plebiscite on a directly elected mayor for the city and county of Dublin is held, it is of the utmost importance that the citizens are fully informed of what is being proposed, are made aware of the scale of what will emerge, are shown how it will be funded and are able to understand the impact it will have on the delivery of services and infrastructure in their local areas.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.