Mr. Se?n Finan:

In our submission we made the point that BECCS is not recognised in the list of technologies. Carbon capture and storage is but the list does not specifically refer to BECCS or pyrogenic carbon capture and storage using pyrolysis.

We believe that should be a key component. It is very clear from reports from the International Energy Agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and elsewhere that it is recognised as a contributor. The point included within our submission was specifically around one of our members, Ethanol Europe. They have done some work around the opportunity for storage of carbon from a number of sectors, particularly the fermentation industry. They are involved in the production of ethanol for both industrial use and as a fuel. Our point was that the policy framework mechanism does not recognise or place a value on that storage. Until there is some manner of valuing it, it is going to be difficult to develop. It is another avenue and opportunity which needs supporting legislation, potentially through this or through another mechanism by which it can be made economically viable and can help to deliver the overall objectives.

There is a big opportunity particularly from the biomethane sector. Biogas is produced at 60% methane, 30% carbon dioxide and 10% hydrogen sulfide, which is of no value. There is a very valuable component within biomethane which should be harnessed. Bio-carbon dioxide can be an important product. I refer to the beverage sector and the animal slaughtering sector. Many sectors use carbon dioxide and need it for their production processes. At a broad level, there needs to be a legislative or policy framework around this to encourage its development. Our member, Ethanol Europe, specifically James Cogan, has done work on this area and is strongly encouraging it to be developed in Ireland. I am sure he would be happy to come in and talk to the committee about it.