Martin Browne (Tipperary, Sinn Fein) | Oireachtas source

Our next business is our engagement with Ms Katie McNelis, petitioner, on petition No. 00036/21, reform of information for thatched heritage buildings.

Before we start, I wish to explain some limitations to parliamentary privilege and the practices of the Houses regarding references witnesses may make to other persons in their evidence. The evidence of witnesses physically present or who give evidence from within the parliamentary precincts is protected pursuant to both the Constitution and statute by absolute privilege. Witnesses are reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice to the effect that they should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable, or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity. Therefore, if any of their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, the witnesses will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that the witnesses comply with such direction. Before we hear from our witnesses, I propose we publish their opening statements on the committee's website. Is that agreed? Agreed.

On behalf of the committee, I extend a warm welcome to Ms Katie McNelis, the petitioner, Mr. Eoin Darby, a thatch property owner, both of whom are here in person, and Mr. Ciaran McDonnell of the Thatch Property Insurance Action Group, who is appearing virtually over MS Teams. I understand Ms McNelis and Mr. Darby will make the opening statements. I suggest that both should make their opening statements for around ten minutes. We will then have questions and comments from members. Each member will have around ten minutes. Members may speak more than once.