Mr. James Benson:

I think what is required there is a review of what is best in a particular area. Again, the planning authority and local authority should be involved, because they are best placed to know what is required for their own community set-ups. It does not necessarily mean a reduction in open space. However, quantity does not exactly give us quality either. I think a combination of both approaches is required. We are not advocating for less open space, but more quality open space. That will come down to individual assessment by the local authorities and planning authority. The benefit of that approach is that we could have greater own-door access. It also allows for a greater mix of tenure within that, and the extension of units for reasons of age and demographics, whatever the case may be. It opens up the mix and provides for a greater community mix and requirements. It is not the only solution, but it is something that should be reviewed. There is potential to enhance without any derogation in standards. That is where we need to get to. We do not need to deregulate or have a derogation in standards. It is worth investigating if we can make changes to enhance communities and developments for the better for those within them without a derogation in standards or reduced affordability..