Mr. James Menton:

I believe so. It is in our interests that the taxpayer is protected because we want the building to be there. Maybe its useful life is only 70 or 75 years; the lease is much longer than that. However, it is not unreasonable to assume that after 75 years the building would need to be remodelled, rejuvenated. That would be a matter of negotiation between the three parties in the same way as it has been, albeit for a longer period of time. I hope the next negotiation will be much shorter.