Mr. Simon McGarr:

Certainly. Were a freehold to transfer, there would be no covenants in respect of the permitted use of the hospital during that time. It would be owned by the State, to be used as the State saw fit. In addition, there would not be a reversion to the freeholder at the end of the lease and there would not be controls in respect of the covenants relating to the mortgaging and so on, which are agreed between the parties.