David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein) | Oireachtas source

The unintended consequences the Minister mentioned are, obviously, issues we do not want to see happen. I thank him for pointing them out and thank his officials for having studied the amendments. More broadly, NIMS is very important and will continue to be important once the Bill passes and becomes operational. The Minister mentioned the HIQA report of last year. In constructing the Bill and taking account of the issues I have flagged by way of these amendments, has he or any of his officials engaged with HIQA specifically on its views regarding NIMS?

I understand it has concerns. Whether those concerns can be addressed through changes in how NIMS operates may be the issue of debate. If that is the case, that is fine.

This amendment provides for a time when a different system may be put in place. I may be wrong but my understanding is that HIQA would have a view on that matter. I will not speak for HIQA as it is important it speak for itself. Has the Minister or his officials engaged with it? If so, what changes are we looking at with regard to NIMS? What changes will be made to address the concerns raised by HIQA? If those concerns are being addressed, perhaps the amendment is not relevant. Will the Minister outline what proposed changes arise from discussions he has had with HIQA and when they will be made?