Lynn Ruane (Independent) | Oireachtas source

Obviously, I am largely supportive of the framework but there were three points in it to which I want to draw attention. One of those is in regard to paragraph (9) of the regulation. I was wondering where it leaves us in respect of the Special Criminal Court, or if that arises at all. The paragraph refers to the notion of transparency. I am wondering if it is possible for us to remain in line with the framework, while also having the Special Criminal Court in place.

The next point relates to paragraph (10), which refers to ironing out the discrimination within the legal profession. However, there is no mention of economic discrimination in the law profession. There is currently only one bursary that I am aware of in respect of King's Inns and passing the Bar exam in order to become a barrister. I am wondering would this funding see that those who are able to get into the law profession would gain more training rather than encouraging those who cannot enter it in the first place to access it.

My final point is on paragraph (18), which states that it is important to look at the framework in the context of the cross-sectional feminist approach and how that is taken into account when analysing the success of the programme. If the funding only results in white middle- and upper-class women getting access to the law sector, then this will not be a success in the wider scheme of things. I am wondering how important paragraphs (18) and (10) are in relation to each other in the context of ensuring that the gender aspect involves an intersectional aspect. Is there any way we can make recommendations in respect of the wording on frameworks or what way does it work?