Malcolm Byrne (Fianna Fail) | Oireachtas source

I again thank the witnesses for a fascinating exchange focusing on many crucial issues. I will delve into some other issues we will consider. The first question is directed in particular at Ms Fitzpatrick and the sector she represents. Obviously, we see that the new media commission will have a regulatory role. Does Ms Fitzpatrick also see it having a role in fostering and supporting the development of the content creation sector in Ireland? This links to how the content levy will be used.

How could that happen most effectively?

Any of our guests can reply to my next query on algorithmic decision-making. I have been asking many questions about the role of the commission in deciding the code and enforcing transparency in algorithmic decision-making. It relates to the challenge of balancing freedom of expression with the right to a good name and the takedown powers of the new regulator. In what circumstances can a regulator order a social media company to take down particular material? In Germany, this issue arose around Holocaust denial in particular. German authorities can tell social media companies, particularly those of a certain size, to take material down quickly. I wish to cite an example that Dr. Docquir might not be aware of, but others will. There was a recent situation involving Presentation College Carlow where a series of statements started to be made online about the school. They were subsequently proven false but they were damaging to the reputation of the school, in particular its male teachers. Very quickly, the story exploded all over social media. The school has won a judgment from the Press Council but that is only part of the steps necessary. In such circumstances where the reputation of an individual or institution has been badly damaged online, what role should the media commission have?