Mr. Adam Harris:

I want to address a couple of the points raised by Deputy Canney. Building on the chief commissioner's point on delays in implementation, it is worth noting the significant surprise within the disability community that the optional protocol was not agreed to on the same day the convention was commenced because the reality is that this had always been expected prior to the ratification of the convention. I note the Secretary General's response today but when queries were raised on the night of the ratification of the convention as to why there were delays, they went unanswered. While the disability community notes the Department's delays and the challenges it faces, ultimately when we talk about implementing with meaning, we believe the meaning the optional protocol will provide to people with disabilities will involve having recourse and a demonstrated commitment by the State to live up to the values of the convention. That really must proceed with urgency.

The issue of funding reaching people with disabilities is highly relevant to Article 4.3 of the convention, which refers to the role of disabled persons' organisations. In Ireland, we are in an unusual position in that we do not have well-funded, established disabled people's organisations, and service providers have a disproportionate influence on policy and advocacy matters within the State. While the work being done by the Department with the Disability Participation and Consultation Network is welcome, Article 4.3 is not just about advocacy; it is also about making sure the voice of people with disabilities directly influences how services are designed and delivered.