Louise O'Reilly (Dublin Fingal, Sinn Fein) | Oireachtas source

How has the Supreme Court judgment in CRH v. Competition and Consumer Protection Commission affected the office's ability to tackle white-collar crime? Can Mr. Drennan provide more information about how the judgment has created difficulties, particularly in the context of differentiating between people's home, personal and work devices? Can he elaborate on the points that are made on page 20 of the submission in the context of amendments. I know that this is a matter that goes beyond the role of the office. There is a discrepancy between what is working and what is not. Obviously, people have the right to switch off but we all use our personal devices for work from time to time. There is something of a grey area in this regard and has that given rise to difficulties for the ODCE?