Christopher O'Sullivan (Cork South West, Fianna Fail) | Oireachtas source

I thank the Minister for bringing this to us today. To say it is not ideal is a bit of an understatement. We are where we are, however. If anything, this agreement underlines and further emphasises the need for immediate action in respect of our goals regarding the reduction of emissions and meeting our targets. The figure of €50 million is one we could use here in our economy and put into our own infrastructure, but this is what we have met with. The point I am trying to make is that this necessity underlines and re-emphasises the importance of meeting our goals.

In that regard, I have some questions concerning updates on particular steps. The first is marine planning legislation, which is going to be vital in stepping up our ambition in offshore wind energy. Where does that legislation stand and what kind of timelines can we expect for a Bill coming through the Houses? I would also like to get the thoughts of the Minister regarding wind energy. The possibilities of offshore wind are spoken about a great deal, but there is also a major part to play for onshore wind in reaching our renewable energy goals. It has huge part to play in helping us to do that, although I know it is difficult and can be contentious. I believe, however, that there should be an emphasis on continuing onshore wind projects, where possible.

Turning to retrofitting, which is obviously a major part of the programme for Government and how we achieve more efficient heating, could the Minister update us on where that scheme stands? As we know, the current Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland, SEAI, scheme is caught up in administration. There are some long waiting times, up to six months in some instances, where people are put in applications for the SEAI grant to retrofit their homes. That needs to be addressed. Is there a plan to bolster the staff complement administering that scheme so that applications can be dealt with faster?

Finally, and this is not quite under the remit of the Minister, but he might have answers to this question since he is in Cabinet. A robust, extensive and significant agri-environmental scheme is absolutely vital in ensuring that in some years' time we are not facing these types of penalties again. It is not only that aspect which is important, but also bringing the farming community and the industry with us in reaching our goals. One of the most important elements of the programme for Government is the introduction of results-based agri-environmental schemes, where farmers are being encouraged to not only protect but enhance and increase biodiversity on their land. The sequestration element of native woodlands must also be considered. Where do we stand with that? I appreciate that the Minister may not be able to provide a detailed update on that, but I would just like to emphasise its importance. I have probably gone a bit over my time, I am sorry.