Carol Nolan (Laois-Offaly, Independent) | Oireachtas source

I thank both witnesses for their comprehensive presentations. This is of significant concern to rural Deputies like myself. I represent Laois-Offaly. This is about job retention in rural communities. I understand that there will be significant job losses if this derogation is not sought. I am also very concerned that it will lead to the creation of a cartel and a monopoly. More concerning is the fact that it represents another financial burden that farmers who are already struggling to make a living do not need. I am very concerned about the whole situation. In addition to political will, we need common sense here. It is not rocket science. The derogation needs to be sought. That will hopefully put the issue to bed and protect 3,000 jobs.

Do the witnesses believe their right to earn a living as pharmacists or responsible persons will be adversely impacted if the Department does not avail of the derogation? Is the UK operating a similar system? What type of system is it operating? Could that be used as a template for Ireland's approach? My final question relates to Scandinavia. I understand that Denmark and Sweden have separated the functions of prescribing and dispensing.

Could that be a possible solution here? I understand it is working effectively in those Scandinavian countries. If we hit an obstacle, and we should not because the derogation is there to be sought and that should be the end of it, could that also be a good solution if solutions are needed?