Mr. David Cicilline:

When the Twitter CEO made the decision to ban political advertising, he stated:

A political message earns reach when people decide to follow an account or retweet. Paying for reach removes that decision, forcing highly optimized and targeted political messages on people. We believe this decision should not be compromised by money. [...] This isn't about free expression. This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today's democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle.

Is that an accurate statement of the CEO's position?