Michael Harty (Clare, Independent) | Oireachtas source

I thank the Chairman for the opportunity to ask questions and I thank the witnesses from the marine co-ordination group for coming in. Following Deputy Naughten's questions, my question concerns offshore marine renewable energy development, particularly at Moneypoint power station. As we know, Moneypoint must cease operating by 2025. It has already almost ceased electricity production except in exceptional circumstances. There will be job losses at Moneypoint. The workforce is being reduced by 50% as we speak. A €5 million just transition proposal has been included in this year's budget. It targets the peat-burning stations in the midlands. The Taoiseach confirmed to me this afternoon that there will be a similar fund for Moneypoint, hopefully in the near future. Given our target of 70% dependence on renewable energy by 2030, the potential for that offshore wind development in Moneypoint is substantial. It has two things going for it. It has one of the deepest seaports in Europe and it also has the transmission infrastructure with two 400 MW lines radiating across the country.

Ms Graham mentioned strategic marine activity zones. Does she see Moneypoint as one such potential zone? It combines potential wind energy generation off the coast of Clare, tidal potential in the River Shannon, wave energy potential and the necessary infrastructure. It also has the port. The port would be very important if Moneypoint was designated as a centre for wind energy research and development. There is great potential for Moneypoint to be used as a place to manufacture wind turbines rather than importing them. As it is a port, it could also be used as to service wind turbines off the west coast. As I say, the transmission potential is already there. I think Moneypoint produces 900 MW per year. Where does Ms Graham see Moneypoint fitting into the strategic development of offshore wind?