Tim Lombard (Fine Gael) | Oireachtas source

We might consider a different format.

I welcome the officials from the Department. It is great to have everyone here. We are debating a very important issue. Could our guests provide clarification on the cost–benefit ratio and how it operates? In the presentation, a ratio of 1.15:1 was referenced as the most conservative estimate. The higher estimate is 2.14:1. These are competing figures. The delegates might elaborate on why there is a difference. How was the analysis carried out?

Our guests might also elaborate on the key indicators that were not taken into consideration. One of these was e-health. An unusual indicator mentioned was climate change. I have never come across the latter being used in that way until now. We have obviously gone through a very extensive process in the Oireachtas producing a climate change report. All Departments told us what they need to do to ensure that we will meet our targets for 2030 and 2050. Mr. Ó hÓbáin might elaborate on why this was not considered a priority when it came to the issue itself. The lack of broadband in rural Ireland and the climate change issue are tied together. Why is the climate change element not central to the figures? Why was it excluded?