Bríd Smith (Dublin South Central, People Before Profit Alliance) | Oireachtas source

I thank the commission for its presentation.

Having heard everything, I accept the commission’s point about the importance of the rigour of the process in the public interest and that requirement is legislated for.

In the seven years between 2012 and 2019, much has changed with this particular case, as well as the wider case of how we deal with climate change and the urgency with which we address it. We have a report that stated this plant would not be efficient and, therefore, did not get its certification. On the other hand, the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, gave it a high level rating regarding emissions. The commission examines economic efficiency but the EPA examines emissions. Who looks at the needs of the planet and the reduction of our carbon footprint? Where does that all tie in? There are parallel processes which do not necessarily speak to each other. If it has happened in this particular case, we need to find a solution quickly because decisions on other plants may be impacted.

The commission referred to another plant which is tied up with a gas terminal. Where is that located? Is there an appeals process or a review where engagement can be restarted with this company in order that we might save the day?